While venture capitalists pass on companies for many reasons, one of the most common reasons is that they don't think the opportunity is "big enough".
What does this mean? It means that even if the company executes as planned, the VC doesn't think the exit will be large enough to generate the VC-sized returns. This determination is based on the venture capitalist's "fund math" and their expected returns model. It means that VC doesn't think he will make a big enough return by investing here.
What doesn't this mean? This doesn't mean that the business is not going to succeed. It doesn't mean that the entrepreneur will fail. It just means that the VC doesn't think that the return profile of an investment in the business is a fit for a venture capital investment.
Like all VC's, I pass on many companies that I think will be successful. I pass on many teams I really like. And when I do, I try to make sure that I communicate the reason for my decision. Specifically, I state that I think the entrepreneur will make money here -- I just don't think I will generate the risk-adjusted returns I need.
I think the industry places too much of a premium on raising venture capital. The whole process of starting a technology company has so much inertia towards raising VC financing. Entrepreneurs can create great businesses -- and have great outcomes -- without raising any venture. Just ask James Hong at HotOrNot, Eric Marculier at MyBlogLog, and David Clouse of VRBO.
Part of the problem, I think, is that the technology startup ecosystem seems to be structured so that the goal of every entrepreneur is to raise venture financing. There is a pretty gravitational force that pulls entrepreneurs towards raising VC dollars -- and it's often hard for an entrepreneur to overcome the inertia.
However, I also think that a big part of the problem is that there is no good word/phrase to describe these type of companies. The only phrase I've heard used is "lifestyle business" -- but I think that is inaccurate and pretty demeaning. It falsely implies that these entrepreneurs aren't working as hard as those of VC-backed companies. It falsely implies that these entrepreneurs are choosing a better lifestyle than they would have if they were operating a VC-backed company. And, as 37signals has written, it condescendingly implies that "A lifestyle business is for the hacks and amateurs while a real business is for the big guns and grown-ups."
So, I think we need a new word. Something that isn't demeaning. Something that doesn't imply lazyness or lack of effort.
PLEDGES
ChallengePost does not guarantee pledges will be collectable. Successful solvers who identify pre-existing solutions will not receive cash, but their profiles will reflect their success and how many people they helped.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Will remain with whoever successfully solves the challenge.